![]() StringBuilder completeMessage = new StringBuilder() CONFORMING TO The bzero() function is deprecated (marked as LEGACY in POSIX.1-2001) use memset(3) in new programs. Zero-copy In addition to the project, look at Gins source code and see that the following two functions do not need to be copied. POSIX.1-2008 removes the specification of bzero().The bzero() function first appeared in 4.3BSD. Basic data structure // StringToBytes converts string to byte slice without a memory allocation. This.WriteConsole("Bytes is " + bytes.ToString()) ĬompleteMessage.AppendFormat("", (data, 0, bytes)) Ĭonsole.WriteLine("Cannot read from this network stream") NetworkStream stream = client.GetStream() īytes = stream.Read(data, 0, data.Length) Using (TcpClient client = new TcpClient(ConnectIP, ConnectPort)) The explicitbzero() function is a nonstandard extension that is also present on some of the BSDs. Does that mean the server is shutting down the connection before the response is sent? Or, is there another possibility for why I am not Why would the trace on the 3rd party end show the response as being sent but I'm receiving nothing. Receiving a response for that one request even though the 3rd party trace shows that a response is being sent. We are going to put a trace on our end to see what we receive later on but I thought I'd ask my question now so that I'm prepared. On good connections, you may receive your packets fast enough that you don't notice, but it's entirely I'm really appreciate some assistance in resolving this problem.Ī call to Read should only return zero bytes when the peer socket is closed, so I would suggest that you check what is really happening by analyzing what is really going on using Fiddler or similar tools.Įven though this isn't part of your question, I would also double check your receiving code I'm specifically worried about the way you receive your response. Possible that you get a fragment of the response the first time you call Read, and that since nothing is on the wire yet (maybe because the next packet was bad and got discarded), stream.DataAvailable returns false. ![]() Response since TCP is reliable, you will get the missing part the next time around, which would end up desynchronizing your protocol irreversibly. I have written code that is supposed to count sequential zeros. Remember: TCP is a Stream oriented protocol which isn't naturally broken into records or datagrams the protocol itself should provide some envelope that allows you to detect (either implicitly or explicitly) where a message starts and ends. When you enter a number, for example 55 which in binary is 0011 0111, the Result is supposed to be 2 and 1, instead I only get 2 and.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |